Smith v. Graves

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Smith v. Graves

305 A.D.2d 419, 758 N.Y.S.2d 506, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5131

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 5, 2003

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 305 A.D.2d 419 (Smith v. Graves) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Graves, 305 A.D.2d 419, 758 N.Y.S.2d 506, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5131 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Freeman, J.), entered December 17, 2001, as denied his petition to suspend his child support obligation.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the father’s contentions, he failed to establish that the mother deliberately frustrated or actively interfered with his visitation rights (see Matter of Clum v Seksinsky, 263 AD2d 507, 508 [1999]; Matter of Vanderhoff v Vanderhoff, 207 AD2d 494, 495 [1994]; Weinreich v Weinreich, 184 AD2d 505, 506 [1992]; Resnick v Zoldan, 134 AD2d 246, 247 [1987]). Therefore, the Family Court properly denied his petition seeking to suspend his child support obligation with respect to the parties’ teenaged daughter.

The father’s remaining contentions are without merit. S. Miller, J.P., Krausman, Luciano and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Freeman, J.), entered December 17, 2001, as denied his petition to suspend his child support obligation.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the father’s contentions, he failed to establish that the mother deliberately frustrated or actively interfered with his visitation rights (see Matter of Clum v Seksinsky, 263 AD2d 507, 508 [1999]; Matter of Vanderhoff v Vanderhoff, 207 AD2d 494, 495 [1994]; Weinreich v Weinreich, 184 AD2d 505, 506 [1992]; Resnick v Zoldan, 134 AD2d 246, 247 [1987]). Therefore, the Family Court properly denied his petition seeking to suspend his child support obligation with respect to the parties’ teenaged daughter.

The father’s remaining contentions are without merit. S. Miller, J.P., Krausman, Luciano and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

305 A.D.2d 419, 758 N.Y.S.2d 506, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-graves-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack