Smith v. Graham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Smith v. Graham

277 A.D.2d 1116

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 19, 1950

StatusPublished

This text of 277 A.D.2d 1116 (Smith v. Graham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Graham, 277 A.D.2d 1116 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondent on the authority of Tyler v. Windels (186 App. Div. 698, affid. 227 N. T. 589). We are not unmindful of the doctrine enunciated in Restatement of the Law of Contracts (Vol. 1, § 198, and particularly illustration 9 thereunder; N: V. Ann. to Restatement, Contracts, § 198, p. 95); see also, Williston on Contracts (Vol. 2, Rev. ed., § 504, pp. 1469-1472). Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondent on the authority of Tyler v. Windels (186 App. Div. 698, affid. 227 N. T. 589). We are not unmindful of the doctrine enunciated in Restatement of the Law of Contracts (Vol. 1, § 198, and particularly illustration 9 thereunder; N: V. Ann. to Restatement, Contracts, § 198, p. 95); see also, Williston on Contracts (Vol. 2, Rev. ed., § 504, pp. 1469-1472). Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 A.D.2d 1116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-graham-nyappdiv-1950.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack