Smith v. . Graham

New York Court of Appeals

Smith v. . Graham

116 N.E. 1076, 221 N.Y. 498, 1917 N.Y. LEXIS 1346

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. . Graham. Read the opinion of the Court — 217 N.Y. 655 →

New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 8, 1917·Published

Opinion

Motion granted, the re-argument to be limited to the question whether the judgment should be modified by pro *499 viding in substance that nothing therein contained shall prohibit the defendant from removing the addition from the lands described in the deed of. May 2, 1905, and erecting or remodeling the addition so as to make it a dwelling as defined in the deed of August 9, 1899.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion granted, the re-argument to be limited to the question whether the judgment should be modified by pro *499 viding in substance that nothing therein contained shall prohibit the defendant from removing the addition from the lands described in the deed of. May 2, 1905, and erecting or remodeling the addition so as to make it a dwelling as defined in the deed of August 9, 1899.

Smith v. . Graham, 116 N.E. 1076, 221 N.Y. 498, 1917 N.Y. LEXIS 1346 (N.Y. 1917).

Pincite

116 N.E. 1076 (Smith v. . Graham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.