Smith v. Gould

34 Misc. 518, 69 N.Y.S. 954
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedApril 15, 1901
StatusPublished

This text of 34 Misc. 518 (Smith v. Gould) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Gould, 34 Misc. 518, 69 N.Y.S. 954 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1901).

Opinion

Bischoff, P. J.

The determination at Special Term favorable to the motion for a reference was reviewable at the General Term and that court could in its discretion deny the motion, hut a further appeal to test the soundness of this exercise of discretion does not lie. Martin v. Windsor Hotel Co., 70 N. Y. 101.

Leventritt and Clarke, JJ., concur.

Appeal dismissed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martin v. . Windsor Hotel Co.
70 N.Y. 101 (New York Court of Appeals, 1877)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 Misc. 518, 69 N.Y.S. 954, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-gould-nyappterm-1901.