Smith v. Gomez

Supreme Court

Smith v. Gomez

568 U.S. 960, 133 S. Ct. 479

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedOctober 15, 2012

DocketNo. 12-5771

StatusPublished

This text of 568 U.S. 960 (Smith v. Gomez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Gomez, 568 U.S. 960, 133 S. Ct. 479 (2012).

Pincite

Opinion

C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certio-rari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Mar[961]*961tin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certio-rari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Mar[961]*961tin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

568 U.S. 960, 133 S. Ct. 479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-gomez-scotus-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack