Home/Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas/Smith v. Gohmert

Smith v. Gohmert

976 S.W.2d 212, 1998 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 119, 1998 WL 684478
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. Gohmert. Read the opinion of the Court — 1998 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 19 →
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided September 30, 1998·No. No. 72,845·Published

Opinions

DISSENTING OPINION TO DENIAL OF APPLICANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING

BAIRD, Judge,

dissenting.

For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion on original submission, I believe the instant motion for rehearing should be granted. Additionally, I would grant rehearing to determine if Tex.Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.08 is the. appropriate vehicle to determine whether applicant’s allegation that his constitutional right to a speedy trial has been violated. Because the majority fails to do so, I dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Gohmert, 976 S.W.2d 212, 1998 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 119, 1998 WL 684478 (Tex. 1998).

976 S.W.2d 212 (Smith v. Gohmert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.