Smith v. Gimbel Bros.

259 A.D. 1037, 21 N.Y.S.2d 400, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7880

This text of 259 A.D. 1037 (Smith v. Gimbel Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Gimbel Bros., 259 A.D. 1037, 21 N.Y.S.2d 400, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7880 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Opinion

Action to recover for breach of warranty of safety, plaintiff having sustained injuries to her head and hair during the use of a permanent wave preparation sold to her by the appellant. Cross-complaint by the appellant against the defendant-respondent for indemnification. Judgment entered on the verdict of a jury in favor of plaintiff against the appellant and in favor of the defendant-respondent against the appellant unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
259 A.D. 1037, 21 N.Y.S.2d 400, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7880, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-gimbel-bros-nyappdiv-1940.