Smith v. Gimbel Bros.

259 A.D. 1037, 21 N.Y.S.2d 400, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7880

Opinion

Action to recover for breach of warranty of safety, plaintiff having sustained injuries to her head and hair during the use of a permanent wave preparation sold to her by the appellant. Cross-complaint by the appellant against the defendant-respondent for indemnification. Judgment entered on the verdict of a jury in favor of plaintiff against the appellant and in favor of the defendant-respondent against the appellant unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Gimbel Bros., 259 A.D. 1037, 21 N.Y.S.2d 400, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7880 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

259 A.D. 1037 (Smith v. Gimbel Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.