Smith v. Ghana Commercial Bank, Ltd.
566 F. App'x 543
Opinion
Theo Smith appeals from an order directing him to pay sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. Upon careful review, we find no abuse of discretion. See Dunbar v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 709 F.3d 1254, 1258 (8th Cir.2013) (standard of review; history of frivolous litigation is relevant factor in decision to impose sanctions). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. Ghana Commercial Bank, Ltd., 566 F. App'x 543 (8th Cir. 2014).
566 F. App'x 543 (Smith v. Ghana Commercial Bank, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Edgarline Dunbar v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
709 F.3d 1254 (Eighth Circuit, 2013)