Smith v. Ghana Commercial Bank, Ltd.
This text of 566 F. App'x 543 (Smith v. Ghana Commercial Bank, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Theo Smith appeals from an order directing him to pay sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. Upon careful review, we find no abuse of discretion. See Dunbar v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 709 F.3d 1254, 1258 (8th Cir.2013) (standard of review; history of frivolous litigation is relevant factor in decision to impose sanctions). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
566 F. App'x 543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-ghana-commercial-bank-ltd-ca8-2014.