Smith v. Gansheimer, 2008-A-0073 (12-31-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Smith v. Gansheimer, 2008-A-0073 (12-31-2008)

2008 Ohio 6987

CourtOhio Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 31, 2008

DocketNo. 2008-A-0073.

StatusPublished

This text of 2008 Ohio 6987 (Smith v. Gansheimer, 2008-A-0073 (12-31-2008)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Gansheimer, 2008-A-0073 (12-31-2008), 2008 Ohio 6987 (Ohio Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION {¶ 1} On November 20, 2008, plaintiff-petitioner-appellant, Darnell Smith, filed a notice of appeal from an October 20, 2008 judgment entry of the Ashtabula County Court of Common Pleas. Thus, Darnell's notice of appeal was filed thirty-one days after the judgment had been issued by the trial court. Darnell's notice of appeal was due on Wednesday, November 19, 2008, which was not a holiday or a weekend.

{¶ 2} App. R. 4(A) states that: *Page 2

{¶ 3} "A party shall file the notice of appeal required by App. R. 3 within thirty days of the later of entry of the judgment or order appealed or, in a civil case, service of the notice of judgment and its entry if service is not made on the party within the three day rule period in Rule 58(B) of the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure."

{¶ 4} Loc. R. 3(D)(2) of the Eleventh District Court of Appeals provides:

{¶ 5} "In the filing of a Notice of Appeal in civil cases in which the trial court clerk has not complied with Ohio Civ. R. 58(B), and theNotice of Appeal is deemed to be filed out of rule, appellant shall attach an affidavit from the trial court clerk stating that service was not perfected pursuant to Ohio App. R. 4(A). The clerk shall then perfect service and furnish this Court with a copy of the appearance docket in which date of service has been noted. Lack of compliance shall result in the sua sponte dismissal of the appeal under Ohio App. R. 4(A)." (Emphasis sic.)

{¶ 6} Here, Darnell has neither complied with the thirty-day rule set forth in App. R. 4(A) nor alleged that there was a failure by the trial court clerk to comply with Civ. R. 58(B). "The time requirement is jurisdictional in nature and may not be enlarged by an appellate court."Gray v. Kingsville Towing, 11th Dist. No. 2008-A-0057, 2008-Ohio-6056, at ¶ 8, citing State ex rel. Pendell v. Adams Cty. Bd. of Elections (1988), 40 Ohio St.3d 58, 60; App. R. 14(B).

{¶ 7} Thus, this appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, pursuant to App. R. 4(A).

{¶ 8} Appeal dismissed.

DIANE V. GRENDELL, P.J., MARY JANE TRAPP, J., concur.

*Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OPINION {¶ 1} On November 20, 2008, plaintiff-petitioner-appellant, Darnell Smith, filed a notice of appeal from an October 20, 2008 judgment entry of the Ashtabula County Court of Common Pleas. Thus, Darnell's notice of appeal was filed thirty-one days after the judgment had been issued by the trial court. Darnell's notice of appeal was due on Wednesday, November 19, 2008, which was not a holiday or a weekend.

{¶ 2} App. R. 4(A) states that: *Page 2

{¶ 3} "A party shall file the notice of appeal required by App. R. 3 within thirty days of the later of entry of the judgment or order appealed or, in a civil case, service of the notice of judgment and its entry if service is not made on the party within the three day rule period in Rule 58(B) of the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure."

{¶ 4} Loc. R. 3(D)(2) of the Eleventh District Court of Appeals provides:

{¶ 5} "In the filing of a Notice of Appeal in civil cases in which the trial court clerk has not complied with Ohio Civ. R. 58(B), and theNotice of Appeal is deemed to be filed out of rule, appellant shall attach an affidavit from the trial court clerk stating that service was not perfected pursuant to Ohio App. R. 4(A). The clerk shall then perfect service and furnish this Court with a copy of the appearance docket in which date of service has been noted. Lack of compliance shall result in the sua sponte dismissal of the appeal under Ohio App. R. 4(A)." (Emphasis sic.)

{¶ 6} Here, Darnell has neither complied with the thirty-day rule set forth in App. R. 4(A) nor alleged that there was a failure by the trial court clerk to comply with Civ. R. 58(B). "The time requirement is jurisdictional in nature and may not be enlarged by an appellate court."Gray v. Kingsville Towing, 11th Dist. No. 2008-A-0057, 2008-Ohio-6056, at ¶ 8, citing State ex rel. Pendell v. Adams Cty. Bd. of Elections (1988), 40 Ohio St.3d 58, 60; App. R. 14(B).

{¶ 7} Thus, this appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, pursuant to App. R. 4(A).

{¶ 8} Appeal dismissed.

DIANE V. GRENDELL, P.J., MARY JANE TRAPP, J., concur.

*Page 1

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2008 Ohio 6987, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-gansheimer-2008-a-0073-12-31-2008-ohioctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack