Smith v. Gale
137 U.S. 577, 11 S. Ct. 185, 34 L. Ed. 792, 1891 U.S. LEXIS 2045
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
In computing the two years after the entry of a final judgment, decree or order, sought to be reviewed in this court, within which the writ of error must be brought or the appeal taken, the day of the entry of such judgment, decree or order should be excluded. Credit Co. v. Arkansas Central Railway Co., 128 U. S. 258.
The motion to dismiss the appeal in this cause is therefore
Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. Gale, 137 U.S. 577, 11 S. Ct. 185, 34 L. Ed. 792, 1891 U.S. LEXIS 2045 (1891).
137 U.S. 577 (Smith v. Gale) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stringer v. United States
90 F. Supp. 375 (Court of Claims, 1950)
Pillsbury v. Alaska Packers Ass'n
78 F.2d 587 (Ninth Circuit, 1935)
Wheeler v. Lumbermen's Mut. Casualty Co.
6 F. Supp. 532 (D. Maine, 1934)
United States v. Beaman
61 F.2d 493 (Fifth Circuit, 1932)
First Nat. Bank of Haskell v. Drew
1918 OK 4 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1918)
J. D. Randall Co. v. Foglesong Mach. Co.
200 F. 741 (Sixth Circuit, 1912)
State v. Vicknair
43 So. 635 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1906)
Simmons v. Hanne
50 Fla. 267 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1905)
Bowler v. McIntyre
9 Haw. 306 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1893)