Smith v. Frizell
1 How. Pr. 148
This text of 1 How. Pr. 148 (Smith v. Frizell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Smith v. Frizell, 1 How. Pr. 148 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1845).
Opinion
Thought the amendment should be allowed under the general rule; and granted the motion on payment of $7 costs of opposing the motion, and giving a new replevin bond nunc pro tunc, and the sureties therein justifying, provided the form of the existing bond be such that it will not be adapted to the amended writ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 How. Pr. 148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-frizell-nysupct-1845.