Smith v. . French

67 S.E. 249, 152 N.C. 754, 1910 N.C. LEXIS 365
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMarch 9, 1910
StatusPublished

This text of 67 S.E. 249 (Smith v. . French) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. . French, 67 S.E. 249, 152 N.C. 754, 1910 N.C. LEXIS 365 (N.C. 1910).

Opinion

This case was before the Court at a former term, and is reported141 N.C. 1.

Issues were submitted by his Honor, to which we find no exception. While the form of the fourth issue is objectionable and somewhat indefinite, yet, taken in connection with the charge of the judge, we think the jury fully understood what was the real question submitted.

There is evidence in the record that plaintiffs' agent purchased a portion of the property at their own sale, thereby making plaintiffs accountable for its true value.

We have examined the several exceptions to the evidence and the charge and are of opinion that no substantial error was committed which necessitates another trial.

No error.

Cited: Gavin v. Matthews, ante, 196. *Page 721

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. French.
53 S.E. 435 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 S.E. 249, 152 N.C. 754, 1910 N.C. LEXIS 365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-french-nc-1910.