Smith v. . French
This text of 67 S.E. 249 (Smith v. . French) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case was before the Court at a former term, and is reported
Issues were submitted by his Honor, to which we find no exception. While the form of the fourth issue is objectionable and somewhat indefinite, yet, taken in connection with the charge of the judge, we think the jury fully understood what was the real question submitted.
There is evidence in the record that plaintiffs' agent purchased a portion of the property at their own sale, thereby making plaintiffs accountable for its true value.
We have examined the several exceptions to the evidence and the charge and are of opinion that no substantial error was committed which necessitates another trial.
No error.
Cited: Gavin v. Matthews, ante, 196. *Page 721
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
67 S.E. 249, 152 N.C. 754, 1910 N.C. LEXIS 365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-french-nc-1910.