Smith v. Firth

78 N.Y.S. 1137

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Order of affirmance modified, by striking out the word “unanimously,” before the word “decided,” and inserting, after the word “decided,” the words, “Mr. Justice Bartlett sitting, but not voting.” The other portion of the motion, relative to an appeal to the court of appeals, is not passed upon, as the court understands that it has been withdrawn.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Firth, 78 N.Y.S. 1137 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1902).

78 N.Y.S. 1137 (Smith v. Firth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.