Smith v. First Tennessee Bank National Ass'n
This text of 668 F. App'x 41 (Smith v. First Tennessee Bank National Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Melanie and Emanuel Smith appeal the district court’s orders dismissing their civil case. On appeal, we confíne our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because the Smiths’ informal brief does not challenge the bases for the district court’s disposition, they have forfeited appellate review of the court’s orders. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid .the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
668 F. App'x 41, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-first-tennessee-bank-national-assn-ca4-2016.