Smith v. First Tennessee Bank National Ass'n

668 F. App'x 41
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 22, 2016·No. No. 16-1370·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Melanie and Emanuel Smith appeal the district court’s orders dismissing their civil case. On appeal, we confíne our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because the Smiths’ informal brief does not challenge the bases for the district court’s disposition, they have forfeited appellate review of the court’s orders. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid .the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. First Tennessee Bank National Ass'n, 668 F. App'x 41 (4th Cir. 2016).

668 F. App'x 41 (Smith v. First Tennessee Bank National Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.