Smith v. FIRST AMERICAN BANK & TRUST COMPANY

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Smith v. FIRST AMERICAN BANK & TRUST COMPANY

228 S.E.2d 227, 139 Ga. App. 292, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1768

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 9, 1976·No. 52282·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Bell, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff brought this suit to recover a deficiency-balance allegedly due on an installment note and security agreement, plus interest and attorney fees. The case arose out of defendant Bobby Lee Smith’s purchase of a mobile home. His parents, the other defendants, according to the complaint, guaranteed payment of the note and security agreement. The defendant son set up the affirmative defense of accord and satisfaction and the other defendants pleaded that their signatures to the guaranty were obtained by specified acts of fraud and misrepresentation of plaintiff and that the guaranty failed for lack of consideration. The plaintiff moved for summary judgment which the trial court granted. An examination of the record shows that plaintiff has failed to sustain his burden of proof by piercing the allegations of the affirmative defenses. These present material issues of fact for resolution by a jury.

Judgment reversed.

Clark and Stolz, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff brought this suit to recover a deficiency-balance allegedly due on an installment note and security agreement, plus interest and attorney fees. The case arose out of defendant Bobby Lee Smith’s purchase of a mobile home. His parents, the other defendants, according to the complaint, guaranteed payment of the note and security agreement. The defendant son set up the affirmative defense of accord and satisfaction and the other defendants pleaded that their signatures to the guaranty were obtained by specified acts of fraud and misrepresentation of plaintiff and that the guaranty failed for lack of consideration. The plaintiff moved for summary judgment which the trial court granted. An examination of the record shows that plaintiff has failed to sustain his burden of proof by piercing the allegations of the affirmative defenses. These present material issues of fact for resolution by a jury.

Judgment reversed.

Clark and Stolz, JJ., concur.

Smith v. FIRST AMERICAN BANK & TRUST COMPANY, 228 S.E.2d 227, 139 Ga. App. 292, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1768 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

228 S.E.2d 227 (Smith v. FIRST AMERICAN BANK & TRUST COMPANY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related