Smith v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
374 F.2d 892
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedApril 4, 1967
DocketNos. 16100, 16101
StatusPublished
This text of 374 F.2d 892 (Smith v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Smith v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 374 F.2d 892 (3d Cir. 1967).
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of the record of these appeals at 16100 and 16101, we find no prejudicial error. The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed, each party to bear its own costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
374 F.2d 892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-firestone-tire-rubber-co-ca3-1967.