Smith v. Fiore

Connecticut Appellate Court

Smith v. Fiore

520 A.2d 235, 9 Conn. App. 819, 1987 Conn. App. LEXIS 813

CourtConnecticut Appellate Court

DecidedJanuary 20, 1987

Docket4976

StatusPublished

This text of 520 A.2d 235 (Smith v. Fiore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Fiore, 520 A.2d 235, 9 Conn. App. 819, 1987 Conn. App. LEXIS 813 (Colo. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this action, judgment of nonsuit was rendered against the plaintiff for failing to appear at the time the case was scheduled for trial. The plaintiff moved to open the nonsuit, which motion was denied by the court. The plaintiff avers error and claims the trial court abused its discretion in denying the motion to open the nonsuit. We disagree. This case is governed by the principles of Gionfrido v. Wharf Realty, Inc., 193 Conn. 28, 474 A.2d 787 (1984).

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In this action, judgment of nonsuit was rendered against the plaintiff for failing to appear at the time the case was scheduled for trial. The plaintiff moved to open the nonsuit, which motion was denied by the court. The plaintiff avers error and claims the trial court abused its discretion in denying the motion to open the nonsuit. We disagree. This case is governed by the principles of Gionfrido v. Wharf Realty, Inc., 193 Conn. 28, 474 A.2d 787 (1984).

There is no error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

520 A.2d 235, 9 Conn. App. 819, 1987 Conn. App. LEXIS 813, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-fiore-connappct-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack