Smith v. Fidelity Trust Co.

117 So. 791, 96 Fla. 168
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJuly 10, 1928
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 117 So. 791 (Smith v. Fidelity Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Fidelity Trust Co., 117 So. 791, 96 Fla. 168 (Fla. 1928).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this ease the' decree in foreclosure was in favor of the original complainant, Fidelity & Trust Company, a corporation, as the holder of a lien pyior to the rights of the several defendants. It was also in favor of one of the original defendants, the West Coast Lumber & Supply Company, in foreclosure of a subsequent mortgage embracing the same property and decrees the lien in favor of the West Coast Lumber & Supply Company to be inferior and subordinate to the lien decreed in favor of Fidelity Trust Company.

West Coast Lumber & Supply Company has a vital and pecuniary interest in the decree appealed from and is not made a party to this appeal, and therefore, this Court is without jurisdiction in determining the rights of the West Coast Lumber & Supply Company as affected by the final decree.

The notice of appeal limits appellants to those named in the body of the notice of appeal, and, therefore, the provisions of Chap. 11890, Acts of 1927, will not be held to apply to the record in this case.

The appellant, having failed to make all parties affected by the decree parties to this appeal, the appeal should be dismissed and it is so ordered.

Dismissed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur. Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tavern Investment Co. v. Diehl
177 So. 305 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1937)
Gardner v. Northern Investment Corp.
157 So. 665 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1934)
J. W. McWilliams Co. v. Fort Myers Development Corp.
140 So. 902 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)
Hay v. Isetts
125 So. 237 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1929)
Eversfield v. Mayhew
123 So. 737 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
117 So. 791, 96 Fla. 168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-fidelity-trust-co-fla-1928.