Smith v. Fahey

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: March 29, 2006
• Docket: 05-7615
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7615

GREGORY L. SMITH, a/k/a Sharrieff El-Shabazz,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

HELEN F. FAHEY, Chairman of the Virginia Parole Board, in her individual and official capacities; DAVID N. HARKER, Vice Chairman, Virginia Parole Board in his individual and official capacities; GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, in his individual and official capacities; DORIS L. EWING, Manager of the Court & Legal Services Unit of the Virginia Department of Corrections, in her individual and official capacities,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 05-7616

ANTONIO A. ANTHONY,

HELEN F. FAHEY, Chairman of the Virginia Parole Board, in her individual and official capacities; DAVID N. HARKER, Vice Chairman Virginia Parole Board, in his individual and official capacities; GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, in his individual and official capacities; DORIS L. EWING, Manager of the Court & Legal Services Unit of the Virginia Department of Corrections, in her individual and official capacities,

No. 05-7617

ANTHONY DENARO FREEMAN,

HELEN F. FAHEY, Chairman of the Virginia Parole Board, in her individual and official capacities; DAVID N. HARKER, Vice Chairman Virginia Parole Board, in his individual and official capacities; GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, in his individual and official capacities; DORIS L. EWING, Manager of the Court & Legal Services Unit of the Virginia Department of Corrections, in her individual and official capacities,

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-05-52-2)

- 2 - Submitted: March 23, 2006 Decided: March 29, 2006

Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory L. Smith, Antonio A. Anthony, Anthony Denaro Freeman, Appellants Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 3 - PER CURIAM:

Gregory L. Smith, Antonio A. Anthony, and Anthony Denaro

Freeman appeal the district court’s order denying relief on their

42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. See Smith v. Fahey; Anthony v.

Fahey; Freeman v. Fahey, No. CA-05-52-2 (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 6,

2005 & entered Sept. 7, 2005). We also deny Appellants’ motion for

reconsideration of their request to consolidate the filing fee. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 4 -