Smith v. Fagan

17 Cal. 178
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1860·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Baldwin, J. delivered the opinion of the Court

Cope, J. concurring.

The order granting a new trial is affirmed. The bill shows a title to relief upon the ground of the plaintiff’s interest, as a stockholder or partner in the joint stock company mentioned therein; entitling him, if the averments were proved, to a decree affirming his interest, and directing an account. The plaintiff was entitled to an account, and we can see no error in the order of the Court’ for a retrial upon the facts, even if we .are. to regard the [182] statement as properly before us. If there be no statement, then there is no showing or presumption of error in the action of the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Fagan, 17 Cal. 178 (Cal. 1860).

17 Cal. 178 (Smith v. Fagan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mitchell v. County Sanitation District Number One
309 P.2d 930 (California Court of Appeal, 1957)
Hewel v. Hogin
84 P. 1002 (California Court of Appeal, 1906)