Smith v. Fagan
This text of 17 Cal. 178 (Smith v. Fagan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cope, J. concurring.
The order granting a new trial is affirmed. The bill shows a title to relief upon the ground of the plaintiff’s interest, as a stockholder or partner in the joint stock company mentioned therein; entitling him, if the averments were proved, to a decree affirming his interest, and directing an account. The plaintiff was entitled to an account, and we can see no error in the order of the Court’ for a retrial upon the facts, even if we .are. to regard the [182]*182statement as properly before us. If there be no statement, then there is no showing or presumption of error in the action of the Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
17 Cal. 178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-fagan-cal-1860.