Smith v. F. B. Stearns Co.

192 A.D. 915

Opinion

Judgments and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. The complaint alleged that defendants were guilty of fraud in the representation which constituted the warranty and, therefore, in contracting the liability which was the basis of the action. In this respect the case differs from Novotny v. Kosloff (214 N. Y. 12), and falls within subdivision 4 of section 549 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and the consequence of failure to prove the fraud was loss of the action. The complaint was properly dismissed. Present — Jenks, P. J., Mills, Rich, Black-mar and Jaycox, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. F. B. Stearns Co., 192 A.D. 915 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1920).

192 A.D. 915 (Smith v. F. B. Stearns Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Novotny v. . Kosloff
108 N.E. 183 (New York Court of Appeals, 1915)