Smith v. . E.W. Foley Contracting Corporation
143 N.E. 759, 237 N.Y. 601, 1924 N.Y. LEXIS 899
Opinion
*602 Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. . E.W. Foley Contracting Corporation, 143 N.E. 759, 237 N.Y. 601, 1924 N.Y. LEXIS 899 (N.Y. 1924).
143 N.E. 759 (Smith v. . E.W. Foley Contracting Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Murcelo v. H. I. Hettinger & Co.
92 P.R. 398 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1965)