Smith v. Ethicon, Inc.

District Court, S.D. West Virginia·Decided December 17, 2020·No. 2:13-cv-08511·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION

LUCA SMITH, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 2:13-ev-08511 ETHICON, INC., et al., Defendants.

MEMORANADUM OPINION AND ORDER On November 16, 2020, I entered an order directing plaintiff to show cause on or before December 16, 2020, why his case should not be dismissed as to Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and/or Johnson & Johnson for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 41.1 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff did not respond to the Show Cause Order. The court ORDERS, pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 41.1 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure and after weighing the factors identified in Ballard v. Carlson, 882 F.2d 93, 95 (4th Cir. 1989), that Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson are dismissed without prejudice. No defendants remain, and the court DIRECTS the Clerk to dismiss the case and strike it from the active docket. The court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented party. ENTER‘ December 17, 2020

Np

/UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Ethicon, Inc., (S.D.W. Va. 2020).

Smith v. Ethicon, Inc. (Smith v. Ethicon, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ballard v. Carlson
882 F.2d 93 (Fourth Circuit, 1989)