Smith v. EQUITABLE LIFE ASSURANCE SOC'Y OF THE UNITED STATES

New York Court of Appeals

Smith v. EQUITABLE LIFE ASSURANCE SOC'Y OF THE UNITED STATES

13 N.Y.2d 969

New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 31, 1963·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

13 N.Y.2d 969 (1963)

Agnes Smith, Respondent-Appellant,
v.
Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, Appellant-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued October 9, 1963. Decided October 31, 1963.

Michael P. Fogarty, Eugene T. O'Neill and Valentine A. Meehan for appellant-respondent.

Condon A. Lyons for respondent-appellant.

CONCUR: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, FOSTER and SCILEPPI.

Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion. [Motion to amend remittitur, see 13 N Y 2d 1044.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

13 N.Y.2d 969 (1963)

Agnes Smith, Respondent-Appellant,
v.
Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, Appellant-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued October 9, 1963. Decided October 31, 1963.

Michael P. Fogarty, Eugene T. O'Neill and Valentine A. Meehan for appellant-respondent.

Condon A. Lyons for respondent-appellant.

CONCUR: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, FOSTER and SCILEPPI.

Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion. [Motion to amend remittitur, see 13 N Y 2d 1044.]

Smith v. EQUITABLE LIFE ASSURANCE SOC'Y OF THE UNITED STATES, 13 N.Y.2d 969 (N.Y. 1963).

Pincite

13 N.Y.2d 969 (Smith v. EQUITABLE LIFE ASSURANCE SOC'Y OF THE UNITED STATES) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Agnes Smith, Respondent-Appellant, v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, Appellant-Respondent.

Related

Agnes Smith, Respondent-Appellant,
v.
Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, Appellant-Respondent.