Smith v. Emerson Electric Co.
878 S.W.2d 518, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1082, 1994 WL 283149
Opinion
ORDER
Employer appeals the Commission’s decision awarding workers’ compensation benefits to Claimant. We affirm. We find the Commission’s decision is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. Rule 84.16(b)(4). We further find no error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b)(5). An opinion in this case would have no prece-dential value; therefore, we affirm by written order. A memorandum has been issued to the parties for their use only.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. Emerson Electric Co., 878 S.W.2d 518, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1082, 1994 WL 283149 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).
878 S.W.2d 518 (Smith v. Emerson Electric Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.