Smith v. (EEOC) Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

517 F. App'x 159
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 3, 2013·No. No. 13-1117·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kendall Smith appeals the district court’s order dismissing Smith’s civil complaint against the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Equal Emp’t Opportunity Comm’n, No. 8:12-cv-00027-AW, 2012 WL 6727150 (D.Md. Dec. 26, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. (EEOC) Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 517 F. App'x 159 (4th Cir. 2013).

517 F. App'x 159 (Smith v. (EEOC) Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Crandell v. United States
W.D. Virginia, 2022