Smith v. East End Electric Light Co.
47 A. 1123, 198 Pa. 19, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 725
Opinion
As nothing appears in the evidence to support the plaintiff’s claim in this case, our conclusion is that the court below committed no error in entering and refusing to take off the nonsuit complained of.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. East End Electric Light Co., 47 A. 1123, 198 Pa. 19, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 725 (Pa. 1901).
47 A. 1123 (Smith v. East End Electric Light Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. Jackson
63 So. 782 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1913)
Kahn v. Kittanning Electric Light Co.
85 A. 1117 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1913)
Citizens' Ry. & Light Co. v. Case
138 S.W. 621 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1911)
Patterson Coal & Supply Co. v. Pittsburg Railways Co.
37 Pa. Super. 212 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1908)
Aument v. Pennsylvania Telephone Co.
28 Pa. Super. 610 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1905)
Fitzgerald v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co.
50 A. 161 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1901)