Smith v. Dutton

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Smith v. Dutton

322 S.E.2d 368, 171 Ga. App. 914, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 2365

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 4, 1984

Docket68937

StatusPublished

This text of 322 S.E.2d 368 (Smith v. Dutton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Dutton, 322 S.E.2d 368, 171 Ga. App. 914, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 2365 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Banke, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment for the plaintiff on a promissory note. Although each of the enumerations of error concerns an evidentiary question, no transcript of the evidence was prepared, nor has a summary of the evidence been included in the record pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-41. Accordingly, the appeal presents no question upon which we can pass. Nicholson v. Nicholson, 231 Ga. 760 (204 SE2d 292) (1974).

Judgment affirmed.

Pope and Benham, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Banke, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment for the plaintiff on a promissory note. Although each of the enumerations of error concerns an evidentiary question, no transcript of the evidence was prepared, nor has a summary of the evidence been included in the record pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-41. Accordingly, the appeal presents no question upon which we can pass. Nicholson v. Nicholson, 231 Ga. 760 (204 SE2d 292) (1974).

Judgment affirmed.

Pope and Benham, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

322 S.E.2d 368, 171 Ga. App. 914, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 2365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-dutton-gactapp-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack