Smith v. Drake
17 A. 449, 125 Pa. 501, 1889 Pa. LEXIS 741
Opinion
We are not satisfied that the evidence in this case would have warranted the jury in rendering a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. For reasons given by the learned president of the court below tlierg was no error in entering the judgment of nonsuit and afterwards refusing to take it off.
J udgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. Drake, 17 A. 449, 125 Pa. 501, 1889 Pa. LEXIS 741 (Pa. 1889).
17 A. 449 (Smith v. Drake) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lancaster Yellow Cab & Baggage, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
432 A.2d 1143 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1981)
Oklahoma Coal Co. v. Corrigan
1917 OK 443 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1917)