Smith v. DOWCP
This text of Smith v. DOWCP (Smith v. DOWCP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-2880
DORIS F. SMITH, Widow of Reeland T. Smith,
Petitioner,
versus
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PRO- GRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (92-778-BLA)
Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: May 28, 1996
Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Doris F. Smith, Petitioner Pro Se. Cathryn Celeste Helm, Christian P. Barber, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision
and order and decision and order on reconsideration affirming the
administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant
to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 1995). Our review of
the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon sub- stantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Smith v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, No. 92-778-BLA (B.R.B. Aug. 25,
1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Smith v. DOWCP, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-dowcp-ca4-1996.