Smith v. Dorsch-United Limb & Brace, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Smith v. Dorsch-United Limb & Brace, Inc.

38 A.D.2d 583, 328 N.Y.S.2d 616, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2736

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 13, 1971

StatusPublished

This text of 38 A.D.2d 583 (Smith v. Dorsch-United Limb & Brace, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Dorsch-United Limb & Brace, Inc., 38 A.D.2d 583, 328 N.Y.S.2d 616, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2736 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated December 10, 1970, which denied its motion to strike plaintiffs’ statement of readiness and to compel plaintiffs to provide additional hospital record authorizations. Order modified by adding thereto, immediately after the provision therein that the motion is denied, the following: “ except that it is granted to the extent of requiring the additional hospital record authorizations to be furnished.” As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. The authorization shall be furnished within 10 days after service of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry. The additional hospital records requested by defendant related to the controversy in this action. Defendant’s request should have been granted pursuant to CPLR 3121 (subd. [a]). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Munder, Shapiro, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated December 10, 1970, which denied its motion to strike plaintiffs’ statement of readiness and to compel plaintiffs to provide additional hospital record authorizations. Order modified by adding thereto, immediately after the provision therein that the motion is denied, the following: “ except that it is granted to the extent of requiring the additional hospital record authorizations to be furnished.” As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. The authorization shall be furnished within 10 days after service of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry. The additional hospital records requested by defendant related to the controversy in this action. Defendant’s request should have been granted pursuant to CPLR 3121 (subd. [a]). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Munder, Shapiro, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 A.D.2d 583, 328 N.Y.S.2d 616, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2736, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-dorsch-united-limb-brace-inc-nyappdiv-1971.