Smith v. Dixon

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 4, 2024
Docket1D2024-0250
StatusPublished

This text of Smith v. Dixon (Smith v. Dixon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Dixon, (Fla. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D2024-0250 _____________________________

TRAVIS D. SMITH,

Petitioner,

v.

RICKY D. DIXON, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections,

Respondent. _____________________________

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.

December 4, 2024

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004).

LEWIS, ROBERTS, and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur. _____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Travis D. Smith, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baker v. State
29 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 105 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Smith v. Dixon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-dixon-fladistctapp-2024.