Smith v. Ditto

Supreme Court of Florida

Smith v. Ditto

169 So. 924, 125 Fla. 304

DecidedSeptember 21, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 169 So. 924 (Smith v. Ditto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Ditto, 169 So. 924, 125 Fla. 304 (Fla. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

— The appeal brings for review final decree in suit to foreclose a mortgage.

There are assignments of error and cross assignments of error.

The real question involved is simply whether or not there is substantial evidence to support the decree, which question we must answer in the affirmative and affirm the decree. •

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Ellis, P. J., and Teeeell and Bufobd, J. J., concur. Whitfield, C. J., and Beown and Davis, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI