Smith v. Director

165 P. 1171, 84 Or. 631, 1917 Ore. LEXIS 273
Oregon Supreme Court·Decided June 26, 1917·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In Banc.

Mr. Justice Benson

delivered the opinion of the court.

1. The transcript discloses that the notice of appeal was filed February 14, 1917, hut does not contain any proof of service thereof. Appellant has filed his affidavit to the effect that he did serve the notice of appeal and file proof thereof, hut that such proof was lost or mislaid in the clerk’s office. Since the pres ence of such proof in the transcript is jurisdictional (Wolf v. Smith, 6 Or. 73), the motion must he allowed and the appeal is dismissed. Appeal Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Director, 165 P. 1171, 84 Or. 631, 1917 Ore. LEXIS 273 (Or. 1917).

165 P. 1171 (Smith v. Director) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schaefer v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
120 P.2d 235 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1941)
Streby v. State Industrial Accident Commission
215 P. 586 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1923)