Smith v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals

Smith v. Director of Revenue

215 S.W.3d 262, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 185, 2007 WL 324599

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. Director of Revenue. Read the opinion of the Court — 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1144 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 6, 2007·No. No. WD 66272·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Christopher Smith appeals the judgment upholding the Department of Revenue’s revocation of his driver’s license. In his sole point on appeal, Mr. Smith claims the trial court erred in finding his blood alcohol level exceeded the legal limit. He asserts he rebutted the Director of Revenue’s prima facie case by raising a genuine issue regarding the reliability and validity of his breath test result. Mr. Smith’s point is denied, and the judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Christopher Smith appeals the judgment upholding the Department of Revenue’s revocation of his driver’s license. In his sole point on appeal, Mr. Smith claims the trial court erred in finding his blood alcohol level exceeded the legal limit. He asserts he rebutted the Director of Revenue’s prima facie case by raising a genuine issue regarding the reliability and validity of his breath test result. Mr. Smith’s point is denied, and the judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Smith v. Director of Revenue, 215 S.W.3d 262, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 185, 2007 WL 324599 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

215 S.W.3d 262 (Smith v. Director of Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.