Smith v. Diehl

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Smith v. Diehl

2 Binn. 145, 1809 Pa. LEXIS 44

DecidedDecember 15, 1809

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Binn. 145 (Smith v. Diehl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Diehl, 2 Binn. 145, 1809 Pa. LEXIS 44 (Pa. 1809).

Pincite

Opinion

Per. Curiam.

If the court had been called upon to order the clerk how to make out his list, while this rule was in use, they would have directed the priority; but there never has been an application for the benefit of the rule during the árgument period. The application is therefore too late, even if the rule is at present in force; but in fact it has not been adopted in practice for many years.

Motion denied-.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per. Curiam.

If the court had been called upon to order the clerk how to make out his list, while this rule was in use, they would have directed the priority; but there never has been an application for the benefit of the rule during the árgument period. The application is therefore too late, even if the rule is at present in force; but in fact it has not been adopted in practice for many years.

Motion denied-.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Binn. 145, 1809 Pa. LEXIS 44, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-diehl-pa-1809.