Smith v. Dexter

121 Mass. 597, 1877 Mass. LEXIS 61
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided January 25, 1877·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Gray, C. J.

Thq objections to the authority of the officer who served the writ, and to the form of the replevin bond taken in the course of the service, could not properly be made by demurrer, but only by answer in abatement or motion to dismiss, upon either of which the decision of the court below would be final. Docmanny v. Davenant, 6 Mod. 198; S. C. 1 Salk. 220. Bullythorpe v. Turner, Willes, 475, 479. Cooke v. Gibbs, 3 Mass. 193, 196. Browning v. Bancroft, 5 Met. 88. Houghton v. Ware, 113 Mass. 49. Gen. Sts. c. 114, § 10; c. 115, § 7. The irregular form of presenting these questions to that court, appearing to have been by assent of the parties, affords no ground of exception, and cannot give this court jurisdiction to decide issues which could not be regularly brought before it.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Dexter, 121 Mass. 597, 1877 Mass. LEXIS 61 (Mass. 1877).

121 Mass. 597 (Smith v. Dexter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McPartlant v. Sielian
15 Mass. App. Div. 6 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1949)
Tyler v. Boot & Shoe Workers Union
285 Mass. 54 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1933)
Kennedy v. Langdon
123 Mass. 193 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1877)