Smith v. Dept. of Children and Families

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 30, 2016
Docket15-1240
StatusPublished

This text of Smith v. Dept. of Children and Families (Smith v. Dept. of Children and Families) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Dept. of Children and Families, (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed March 30, 2016. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D15-1240 Lower Tribunal No. 14-4555 ________________

Lisa Smith, Appellant,

vs.

The Department of Children and Families, Appellee.

An Appeal from the Department of Children and Families.

Lisa Smith, in proper person.

Leslie Hinds St-Surin, Assistant Regional Legal Counsel, for appellee.

Before ROTHENBERG, LAGOA and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Lisa Smith appeals from a final order of Appellee Department of

Children and Families (the “Department”). In its final order, dated May 8, 2015, the Department rejected certain conclusions in an administrative law judge’s

recommended order pertaining to Ms. Smith’s qualifications to work in

Department-licensed facilities. In particular, the administrative law judge

determined – and the Department rejected – that Ms. Smith established

rehabilitation from a felony conviction that had disqualified her from employment

in two facilities separately serving children and people receiving mental health

treatment.

Notwithstanding Ms. Smith’s unblemished employment history at the

Department-licensed facilities, our review is limited to whether the Department’s

final order comports with section 120.57(1)(l) of the Florida Statutes, and whether

the final order itself is supported by competent substantial evidence. McMillan v.

Dep’t of Children & Families, 868 So. 2d 1286 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). We conclude

that the Department’s final order meets the legal requisites.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McMillan v. Department of Children & Families
868 So. 2d 1286 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Smith v. Dept. of Children and Families, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-dept-of-children-and-families-fladistctapp-2016.