Smith v. Department of Human Services

498 A.2d 267, 1985 Me. LEXIS 853
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided September 23, 1985·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MEMORAMDUM OF DECISION.

Plaintiff Maxine Smith, a recipient of Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC), appeals a decision of the Superior Court (Hancock County) affirming the Department of Human Services’ decision to reduce her February 1984 AFDC payment because she failed to establish good cause for failing to file the required monthly report on time. Plaintiff bore the burden of establishing good cause for noncompliance with AFDC reporting requirements. The Department’s hearing officer found a want of evidence to show good cause because of mail delay, the only excuse asserted by plaintiff. We review that decision by a clearly erroneous standard. Sanford Highway Unit v. Town of Sanford, 411 A.2d 1010, 1013-14 (Me.1980). Since we find no clear error, plaintiff’s appeal must fail.

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Department of Human Services, 498 A.2d 267, 1985 Me. LEXIS 853 (Me. 1985).

498 A.2d 267 (Smith v. Department of Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hall v. Department of Social Welfare
572 A.2d 1342 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1990)