Smith v. Department of Corrections Sussex I State Prison

Fourth Circuit

Smith v. Department of Corrections Sussex I State Prison

583 F. App'x 255

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 26, 2014·No. No. 14-6724·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kyle Delano Smith appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) suit without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Dep’t of Corr., No. 3:14-cv-00058-HEH-MHL (E.D.Va. May 1, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before [256] this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kyle Delano Smith appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) suit without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Dep’t of Corr., No. 3:14-cv-00058-HEH-MHL (E.D.Va. May 1, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before [256] this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Smith v. Department of Corrections Sussex I State Prison, 583 F. App'x 255 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

583 F. App'x 255 (Smith v. Department of Corrections Sussex I State Prison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related