Smith v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation

789 So. 2d 1242, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10659, 2001 WL 848784
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 30, 2001
DocketNo. 1D01-2150
StatusPublished

This text of 789 So. 2d 1242 (Smith v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation, 789 So. 2d 1242, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10659, 2001 WL 848784 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because the notice of appeal was not filed within 30 days of rendition of the final order, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Fla. R.App. P. 9.110(b). This disposition is without prejudice to appellant’s right to pursue relief in the lower tribunal. See, W.T. Holding, Inc. v. State, [1243]*1243Agency for Health Care Administration, 682 So.2d 1224 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

DISMISSED.

MINER, VAN NORTWICK and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

WT Holding, Inc. v. State Agency for Health Care Admin.
682 So. 2d 1224 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
789 So. 2d 1242, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10659, 2001 WL 848784, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-department-of-business-professional-regulation-fladistctapp-2001.