Smith v. Delaware Insurance
11 U.S. 434, 7 Cranch 434
Opinion
The case is too plain for argu-. merit. The jury did not intend to find a general verdict; but to submit the points of law to the Court. If the law had been for the Plaintiffs the Court could only have awarded a venire de novo. The facts ought to hq-ve appeared, so that the judgment might have been either reversed or affirmed upon the merits.
Judgment reversed, and a neid trial awarded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. Delaware Insurance, 11 U.S. 434, 7 Cranch 434 (1813).
11 U.S. 434 (Smith v. Delaware Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Seaweard v. De Armond
198 P. 916 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1921)
Fleishman v. Meyer
80 P. 209 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1905)
Smith and Buchanan v. The Delaware Insurance Company
11 U.S. 434 (Supreme Court, 1813)