Smith v. David
This text of 962 So. 2d 952 (Smith v. David) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Laray SMITH, Petitioner,
v.
Monica DAVID, Chair, Florida Parole Commission, Respondent.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
*953 Petitioner Laray Smith, pro se.
Kim Fluharty, General Counsel, and Bradley R. Bischoff, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Parole Commission, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
Finding no merit to petitioner's claims, we DENY the petition for writ of certiorari. We note that petitioner failed to preserve his inmate account lien argument below. See Kemp v. McDonough, 955 So.2d 635, 637 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).
KAHN, BENTON and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
962 So. 2d 952, 2007 WL 2066004, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-david-fladistctapp-2007.