Home/Supreme Court/Smith v. Curtis

Smith v. Curtis

416 U.S. 995, 94 S. Ct. 2409
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 13, 1974
DocketNo. 73-1394
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 416 U.S. 995 (Smith v. Curtis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Curtis, 416 U.S. 995, 94 S. Ct. 2409 (1974).

Opinion

C. A. 3d Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rodriguez v. City of Passaic
730 F. Supp. 1314 (D. New Jersey, 1990)
41 Fair empl.prac.cas. 273, 40 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 36,251 District Council 47, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Afl-Cio by Its Trustees Ad Litem Cronin, Thomas Paine and Bell, Joann Muldrow, Marshall Walker, Herman v. Bradley, Honorable Edward J., President Judge, Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia Takiff, Honorable Harry A., Court Administrator, Adult Court, Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia Cipriani, Nicholas, Administrative Judge, Family Court, Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia Teti, Joseph, Deputy Court Administrator, Adult Court, Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia Rosengarten, Dr. Leonard, Deputy Court Administrator, Family Division, Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia. Appeal of District Council 47, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Afl-Cio by Its Trustees Ad Litem Thomas Paine Cronin and Joann Bell Marshall Muldrow and Herman Walker
795 F.2d 310 (Third Circuit, 1986)
District Council 47 v. Bradley
795 F.2d 310 (Third Circuit, 1986)
Davidson v. Cannon
474 U.S. 344 (Supreme Court, 1986)
United States v. Franzen
669 F.2d 433 (Seventh Circuit, 1982)
United States ex rel. Hoover v. Franzen
669 F.2d 433 (Seventh Circuit, 1982)
Ressler v. Scheipe
505 F. Supp. 155 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1981)
Pitrone v. Mercadante
420 F. Supp. 1384 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1976)
6th Camden Corp. v. Evesham Tp., Burlington Cty.
420 F. Supp. 709 (D. New Jersey, 1976)
Donald F. Garrett v. James B. Bamford, Chairman
538 F.2d 63 (Third Circuit, 1976)
Gockley v. VanHoove
409 F. Supp. 645 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1976)
Padover v. Gimbel Bros., Inc.
412 F. Supp. 920 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1976)
Pearl Spence, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Jerome W. Spence, Deceased v. Henry D. Staras
507 F.2d 554 (Seventh Circuit, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
416 U.S. 995, 94 S. Ct. 2409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-curtis-scotus-1974.