Smith v. Curtis

416 U.S. 995, 94 S. Ct. 2409
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 13, 1974·No. No. 73-1394·Published·Cited by 14 cases

Opinion

C. A. 3d Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Curtis, 416 U.S. 995, 94 S. Ct. 2409 (1974).

416 U.S. 995 (Smith v. Curtis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rodriguez v. City of Passaic
730 F. Supp. 1314 (D. New Jersey, 1990)
District Council 47 v. Bradley
795 F.2d 310 (Third Circuit, 1986)
Davidson v. Cannon
474 U.S. 344 (Supreme Court, 1986)
United States v. Franzen
669 F.2d 433 (Seventh Circuit, 1982)
United States ex rel. Hoover v. Franzen
669 F.2d 433 (Seventh Circuit, 1982)
Ressler v. Scheipe
505 F. Supp. 155 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1981)
Pitrone v. Mercadante
420 F. Supp. 1384 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1976)
6th Camden Corp. v. Evesham Tp., Burlington Cty.
420 F. Supp. 709 (D. New Jersey, 1976)
Donald F. Garrett v. James B. Bamford, Chairman
538 F.2d 63 (Third Circuit, 1976)
Gockley v. VanHoove
409 F. Supp. 645 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1976)
Padover v. Gimbel Bros., Inc.
412 F. Supp. 920 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1976)