Smith v. Curtis

62 Ky. 281, 1 Duv. 281, 1864 Ky. LEXIS 60
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedDecember 24, 1864
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 62 Ky. 281 (Smith v. Curtis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Curtis, 62 Ky. 281, 1 Duv. 281, 1864 Ky. LEXIS 60 (Ky. Ct. App. 1864).

Opinion

JUDGE ROBERTSON

delivered the opinion of the court :

The circuit court erred in rendering judgment for the value of the mule, without proof or without an assessment by a jury. While all allegations of fact are admitted by the defendant’s default, no allegation of an opinion or estimate of value can be deemed to be admitted; and this is the express provision of the Code.

' Although, then, the judge might, according to the Code, render judgment without a jury in the absence of any answer or other defense, yet the record should show, as it does not in this case, that he heard evidence as to the extent of damages. (Daniel vs. Judy, 14 B. Mon., 394.)

Wherefore, the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kraft v. Ballback
3 S.W.2d 1068 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 Ky. 281, 1 Duv. 281, 1864 Ky. LEXIS 60, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-curtis-kyctapp-1864.