Smith v. Culpepper

33 S.E. 49, 108 Ga. 759, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 354
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided April 20, 1899·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Cobb, J.

It was, upon the trial of an action upon a promissory note given for the purchase of a mule and on its face reserving in the seller the title to the property until paid for, erroneous to strike a plea alleging that the mule had died without any fault or negligence on the part of the defendant, and praying for a rescission of the contract of sale; there being no stipulation therein that the purchaser was to be liable in case the mule died. Civil Code, $ 3543. Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring. Complaint. Before, Judge Reese. Taliaferro superior court. February term, 1898. Horace M. Holden, for plaintiff in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Culpepper, 33 S.E. 49, 108 Ga. 759, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 354 (Ga. 1899).

33 S.E. 49 (Smith v. Culpepper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McKinney v. Battle Bros.
79 S.E. 92 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)