Smith v. Cross

Missouri Court of Appeals

Smith v. Cross

288 S.W.3d 323, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 852, 2009 WL 1664700

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 16, 2009·No. ED 91948·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mother appeals from the judgment of the trial court entered on the parties’ cross-motions to modify the child visitation and custody schedule in a paternity judgment. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). An opinion reeiting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mother appeals from the judgment of the trial court entered on the parties’ cross-motions to modify the child visitation and custody schedule in a paternity judgment. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). An opinion reeiting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Smith v. Cross, 288 S.W.3d 323, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 852, 2009 WL 1664700 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

288 S.W.3d 323 (Smith v. Cross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related