Smith v. Craig

Indiana Supreme Court

Smith v. Craig

13 Ind. 529

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 15, 1859

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 13 Ind. 529 (Smith v. Craig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Craig, 13 Ind. 529 (Ind. 1859).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Suit on a note. Answer, that the note was given for a part of the consideration of land, and that plaintiff had no title thereto, &c. Reply, general denial. Motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction, overruled. Judgment for plaintiff

The only point made in the brief of appellant is, as to the jurisdiction of the Court. This question has been already decided. Harvey v. Dakin, 12 Ind. R. 481.

The judgment is affirmed with 10 per cent, damages and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Suit on a note. Answer, that the note was given for a part of the consideration of land, and that plaintiff had no title thereto, &c. Reply, general denial. Motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction, overruled. Judgment for plaintiff

The only point made in the brief of appellant is, as to the jurisdiction of the Court. This question has been already decided. Harvey v. Dakin, 12 Ind. R. 481.

The judgment is affirmed with 10 per cent, damages and costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 Ind. 529, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-craig-ind-1859.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack