Smith v. Copiah County

239 F. 432, 153 C.C.A. 415, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 2223
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 5, 1917
DocketNo. 2953
StatusPublished

This text of 239 F. 432 (Smith v. Copiah County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Copiah County, 239 F. 432, 153 C.C.A. 415, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 2223 (5th Cir. 1917).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

From our examination and consideration of the record in this case we do not find that the appellant, complainant in the court below, shows any case for the reformation, rescinding, or cancellation of the contract in suit. The reasons given by the District Judge, in which we'mainly concur, fully support the decree rendered. On the cross-appeal we concur with the District Judge in disallowing the liquidated damages claimed.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, and, as both parties appealed, using the same transcript, the costs in this court are equally divided.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
239 F. 432, 153 C.C.A. 415, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 2223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-copiah-county-ca5-1917.