Smith v. Cook
This text of 56 Ga. 661 (Smith v. Cook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was a motion for a new trial, as stated in the bill of exceptions, in an equity cause, in which Hamlin J. Cook was complainant, and F. P. Smith and D. D. Smith were defendants, on the trial of which it is alleged that a decree was rendered in favor of the complainant, but the record before us does not disclose the fact that any verdict or decree was rendered in the cause which this court can either affirm or reverse. If the record contains a full and complete exemplification of the case, as the clerk certifies it does, then it is still pending in the court below, for there does not appear to have been any final disposition of the cause as required by the 4250th section of the Code.
This case comes within the ruling of this court in the case of Bean & Company vs. Hadley, decided at the present term. Inasmuch, therefore, as the record brought here by the plaintiff in error does not affirmatively show that any verdict or decree has been rendered in the cause which this court can either affirm or reverse, it is ordered that the writ of error be dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 Ga. 661, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-cook-ga-1876.